SOCIAL: Is Obama a Mac and Clinton a PC?
Tom Radulovich
tomrad at well.com
Mon Mar 3 10:21:00 PST 2008

February 4, 2008
LINK BY LINK
Is Obama a Mac and Clinton a PC?
By NOAM COHEN
STYLES make fights — or so goes the boxing cliché. In 2008, they
make presidential campaigns, too.
This is especially true for the two remaining Democrats, Hillary
Clinton and Barack Obama. Reporters covering the candidates have
already resorted to traditional analysis of style — fashion choices,
manner of speaking, even the way they laugh. Yet, according to design
experts, the candidates have left a clear blueprint of their personal
style — perhaps even a window into their souls — through the Web
sites they have created to raise money, recruit volunteers and
generally meet-and-greet online.
On one thing, the experts seem to agree. The differences between
hillaryclinton.com and barackobama.com can be summed up this way:
Barack Obama is a Mac, and Hillary Clinton is a PC.
That is, Mr. Obama’s site is more harmonious, with plenty of white
space and a soft blue palette. Its task bar is reminiscent of the one
used at Apple’s iTunes site. It signals in myriad ways that it was
designed with a younger, more tech-savvy audience in mind — using
branding techniques similar to the ones that have made the iPod so
popular.
“With Obama’s site, all the features and elements are seamlessly
integrated, just like the experience of using a program on a
Macintosh computer,” said Alice Twemlow, chairwoman of the M.F.A.
program in design criticism at the School of Visual Arts (who is a
Mac user).
It is designed, she said, even down to the playful logos that
illustrate choices like, Volunteer or Register to Vote. She likened
those touches to the elaborate, painstaking packaging Apple uses to
woo its customers.
The linking of Mr. Obama with Mac and Mrs. Clinton with PCs has
already become something of a theme during the primary. Early in the
campaign, a popular YouTube parody of Apple’s “1984” Super Bowl
ad made Mrs. Clinton the face of oppression. This week on The
Huffington Post, Douglas T. Kendall, the founder of the Community
Rights Counsel, a public interest law firm, made the connection more
explicit.
But the designers believe the comparisons — but not perhaps the
Orwellian overtones — are apt. In contrast to barackobama.com, Mrs.
Clinton’s site uses a more traditional color scheme of dark blue,
has sharper lines dividing content and employs cookie-cutter icons
next to its buttons for volunteering, and the like.
“Hillary’s is way more hectic, it’s got all these, what look
like parody ads,” said Ms. Twemlow, who is not a citizen and cannot
vote in the election.
Jason Santa Maria, creative director of Happy Cog Studios, which
designs Web sites, detected a basic breach of netiquette.
“Hillary’s text is all caps, like shouting,” he said. There
are “many messages vying for attention,” he said, adding,
“Candidates are building a brand and it should be consistent.”
But Emily Chang, the cofounder of Ideacodes, a Web designing and
consulting firm, detected consistent messages, and summed them up:
“His site is more youthful and hers more regal.”
Mr. Obama’s site is almost universally praised. Even Martin Avila,
the general manager of the company responsible for the Republican Ron
Paul’s Web site, said simply, “Barack’s site is amazing.”
But the compliments are clearly double-edged.
While Apple’s ad campaign maligns the PC by using an annoying man in
a plain suit as its personification, it is not clear that aligning
with the trendy Mac aesthetic is good politics. The iPod may be a
dominant music player, but the Mac is still a niche computer. PC, no
doubt, would win the Electoral College by historic proportions (with
Mac perhaps carrying Vermont).
While Mr. Santa Maria praised barackobama.com for having “this
welcoming quality,” he added that it was “ethereal, vaporous and
someone could construe it as nebulous.” He said there was a bit of
the “Lifetime channel effect, you know, vasoline on the lens” to
create a softer effect on the viewer. The “hectic” site that the
Clinton campaign is offering could actually be quite strategic,
exactly in step with her branding. After all, Mrs. Clinton repeatedly
emphasizes how hard she will work for the average American “starting
on Day 1.” If she comes across as energetic online, that may simply
be her intention. If she shouts a bit more, typographically speaking,
that may be the better to be heard.
Unlike the Republicans, the Democratic contenders have incorporated
social-networking tools to their sites — allowing supporters to
create their own groups, for example, though Mr. Obama is considered
the pacesetter in that regard.
“Obama’s campaign gained attention here in the Bay area tech
community early on when he launched the My.BarackObama.com portal
that allowed for personal blogging from the public, messaging with
other supporters, and a host of other tools,” Ms. Chang wrote in an
e-mail message.
On the big Internet issues like copyright, Lawrence Lessig, a
Stanford law professor who is supporting Mr. Obama, said there was
“not a big difference on paper” between the two Democrats. Both
tend to favor the users of the Internet over those who “own the
pipes.” He is impressed by Mr. Obama’s proposal to “make all
public government data available to everybody to use as they wish.”
In the long run, however, Mr. Lessig believes that it is the ability
to motivate the electorate that matters, not simple matters of style.
And he’s a Mac user from way back.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.deeptrouble.com/pipermail/social-deeptrouble.com/attachments/20080303/e380faab/attachment.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: logoprinter.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1810 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.deeptrouble.com/pipermail/social-deeptrouble.com/attachments/20080303/e380faab/attachment.gif
More information about the Social
mailing list