SOCIAL: Anyone using Comcast Digital Cable or ATT U-Verse in SF?

[Kelly hawk]

Yes, I too, pay a crazy amount of money for Speakeasy DSL. But to me, it's totally worth the extra $800/year to know that 24x7x365, I can pick up the phone and the first person I talk to will know what they are talking about and is actually empowered to fix my problem; a Covad tech will arrive the next day if need be, and that tech can get AT&T attention if required. I've never waited on hold more than 10 minutes, and even that was during a planned outage I missed the announcement email about.


On May 4, 2010, at 3:27 AM, Amandeep Jawa wrote:

> 
> Hey folks -
> 
> For years, I've been using the hyper-reliable but crazy-expensive-for-what-little-I-get Speakeasy DSL service for my broadband.  But it is 2010, and I think I should be able to do better than a measly 8Mbps down.  It looks like the best fat-pipe-for-reasonable options are Comcast Cable & ATT U-Verse.  DSLReports.com has a variety of positive and negative reviews of Comcast, and some really bad reviews of U-Verse.... But I'd rather ask you, my peeps.... In particular, anyone using these in SF? How's it doin' fer ya?  
> 
> Anyone, anyone?
> 
> -'deep
> 
> .ps Yes Internet gods! I'm shaking my fists at thee in arrogance and insubordination! Yes, I dare thee to smite me for my hubris!!!! (might as well call a spade a spade...)
> 
> ------
> Sent from my iPad
> http://www.deeptrouble.com
> _______________________________________________
> Social mailing list
> Social at lists.deeptrouble.com
> http://lists.deeptrouble.com/listinfo.cgi/social-deeptrouble.com